On Wednesday, August 17, the Department of Education’s Panel for Education Policy will vote on a $120 million two year contract with telecom giant Verizon to wire our schools. There are at least five good reasons to strongly oppose this contract ( see below.)
At the same time the PEP will be voting on a spending plan that will sharply cut our school budgets – for the third year in a row – and lead to even larger classes.
Join us at the PEP meeting near City Hall to protest this immoral and possibly illegal contract.
Whether you can join us or not, please send the message below to the members of the PEP.
What: Picket and Protest
Where: Murry Bergtraum HS, 411 Pearl Street, Manhattan (4/5/6 or N/R to City Hall / Brooklyn Bridge)
When: Wed. August 17, 2011 at 5 PM
Why? Verizon is shortchanging their own workers and stealing from schoolchildren! Say no to more giveaways to private contractors and more wasted spending on technology while are class sizes are increasing! Tell the PEP to vote down the Verizon contract with the DOE!
Take a stand against the increasing portion of our education budget that is wasted on private contractors and for-profit vendors, like Rupert Murdoch’s Wireless Generation.
Sponsored by: BYNEE, Class Size Matters, CPE-CEP, Grassroots Education Movement, New York City Parents Union, New York Charter Parents Association, NYCC, NYCORE, S.E.E.D.S, Teachers Unite, Independent Community of Educators, The MANY, Teachers for a Just Contract (list in formation)
And please send the following email to the PEP; feel free to change wording and/or add details about the conditions in your child’s school:
Dear PEP member:
Please vote no on the $120 million contract with Verizon. Here are five good reasons:
1. 45,000 Verizon workers are currently on strike, as management has demanded a long list of concessions, cutting their health benefits, pensions, and sick time – givebacks amounting to $20,000 per worker. Meanwhile, the company has $100 billion in revenue, net profits of $6 billion, and Verizon Wireless just paid its parent company a $10 billion dividend. The top five company executives have been paid more than a quarter of a billion dollars over the last four years. This is yet one more corporate attack on the middle class. Why should the city be contracting with such a greedy and unethical company?
2. Verizon is seriously implicated in the recent scandal in which the Special Commissioner of Investigation found that a consultant named Ross Lanham in charge of school internet wiring stole $3.6 million dollars from the city through a false billing scheme, and that Verizon “facilitated this fraud.” Though DOE admits that “Verizon is in discussion with the DOE regarding repaying of the overcharges,” the company has not yet agreed to pay back any of this money, and the case has been referred to the US attorney’s office for possible prosecution. Why should DOE reward Verizon by paying the company more millions?
3. In the same document in which the DOE outlines the contract, there are twenty other instances listed of suspicious or illegal behavior on the part of Verizon, triggering numerous investigations.
4. All NYC public schools are already wired for the internet; but according to the DOE, this second round of wiring is for high-speed internet and hi-definition video to facilitate the expansion of online learning and computerized testing. This is occurring at the same time as budgets are being cut to the bone, schools are losing valuable programs, and class sizes are rising to the highest level in over a decade. A quarter of our elementary schools are so overcrowded they had waiting lists for Kindergarten. It is outrageous that in the midst of this budget crisis, the DOE should be spending $120 million for unnecessary technological upgrades when children do not have seats in their neighborhood schools.
5. Finally, this contract with Verizon began on January 1, 2011, and DOE is only now asking for the PEP to approve it “retroactively.” But there is no allowance for retroactive contracts in state law, unless the chancellor finds that due to an emergency, it is necessary for “the preservation of student health, safety or general welfare” and provides a written justification. This was never done in this case. Thus, this contract with Verizon is likely illegal on the face of it.
I I hope you will vote your conscience, and reject this outrageous contract,
( (name, address)
Send this message to: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; FFoster@schools.nyc.gov; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; JKay3@schools.nyc.gov; EMarti@schools.nyc.gov; Dperuggia@schools.nyc.gov; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; Lnieves01@gmail.com
Thanks, and please forward this message to others who care,